Introduction (½ – 1 page)
· Define “automation,” “AI,” and “the end of work.”
· Explain why this issue matters to Canada and global labour markets.
· Introduce the debate:
o Optimists → technology creates new jobs, raises efficiency.
o Pessimists → machines replace human labour, exacerbate inequality.
· State goal: to objectively present both sides and policy implications for lawmakers.
Background and Context (1 page)
· Trace technological change from industrial revolution to AI era.
· Summarize evidence from readings:
o UN (2017): most automation is task-specific, not full job replacement
o Johal (U of T Mowat Centre): focus on social policy and training needs
o OECD / McKinsey data on rising inequality and polarization
· Clarify that “automation vs jobs” is not new but accelerated by digitalization.
Arguments Supporting(1 page)
· Rising automation risk: routine jobs (mfg., retail, transport) most affected.
· Economic polarization: high-skill jobs grow; middle declines 【GGR209 Class 3 L18-L19】.
· Social inequality: wage stagnation and job insecurity.
· Technological speed: AI advances faster than policy adaptation.
· Brief examples (e.g., self-driving trucks, automated cashiers).
Arguments Against (1 page)
· Job creation effect: tech generates new industries and roles (AI maintenance, data analysis) 【GGR209 Class 3 L14-L15】.
· Task redistribution: humans handle creative / relational aspects while machines do repetitive tasks 【GGR209 Class 3 L16-L17】.
· Historical pattern: previous waves (agricultural, industrial) also caused temporary displacement but eventual growth.
· Limits to automation: cost, regulation, and social acceptance slow adoption.
Policy Responses and Future Outlook (1 – 1.5 pages)
· Education & Retraining: align skills with emerging industries.
· Social protection: enhance employment insurance, minimum wage, UBI debate 【GGR209 Class 3 L18-L19】.
· Corporate responsibility: ethical AI and workforce transition plans.
· International dimension: global North-South inequality and technology access gap.
· Present both supporting and opposing opinions objectively (using bullet points if needed).
Conclusion (½ page)