代写MGT201A、Java/Python编程设计代做
MGT201A_Assessment_2_Brief Page 1 of 6
ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title MGT201A – Project Management
Assessment Task Consultative Report
Individual/Group Individual or Group
Length 2,000 words (or equivalent)
Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful
completion of the task below include:
a) Analyse PM principles and performance domains.
b) Interpret the collaborative role and functions of the project
manager, team and stakeholders.
c) Justify relevant PM methodologies for selected projects.
Submission 12-week duration:
Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 8 (Week 8)
6-week duration:
Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 8 (Week 4)
Weighting 40%
Total Marks 100 marks
Assessment Task
This assessment builds upon the foundational knowledge and skills developed in Assessment 1,
where you selected a project. You will now expand your initial analysis by preparing a
comprehensive consultative report that critically evaluates project selection, planning, and work
strategies within the context of project management.
Please refer to the Instructions for details on how to complete this task.
Context
Effective project management is a critical skill in today's dynamic business environment.
Organisations must select and manage projects strategically to maximize efficiency, minimize risks,
and deliver value. This consultative report assessment challenges you to apply project management
theories, particularly the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) framework v7, to
analyse project selection, planning, and execution.
MGT201A_Assessment_2_Brief Page 2 of 6
You will critically evaluate how project methodologies such as Agile and Waterfall influence project
outcomes, applying structured project planning techniques to develop a robust project management
plan. The assessment also emphasises stakeholder engagement, risk management, and resource
allocation, helping you gain practical, real-world project management skills that align with industry
standards.
By completing this assessment, you will deepen your ability to think strategically, manage project
constraints, and apply project management frameworks in diverse contexts. Whether undertaken
individually or as a group, the report serves as a practical demonstration of project selection and
planning expertise, reinforcing critical skills required for professional project management roles.
Instructions
In this report, you are required to apply key frameworks from the PMBOK v7 to the selected project.
The report should demonstrate a clear understanding of project selection criteria, stakeholder
engagement, planning constraints, risk management, and delivery methodologies, while integrating
PMBOK terminology and processes throughout.
Your group must select from one of the project scenarios provided to you in Assessment 1. You may
work on the same project you selected in Assessment 1, using this as a chance to deepen your
analysis.
Note: This assessment can be completed either individually or in groups of up to four members. If
completed in a group, all members must contribute equally, and a peer evaluation must be
conducted.
The Consultative Report should be structured as follows:
1. Introduction (Approx. 150 words)
Brief overview of the selected project.
Purpose of the report.
2. Project Selection and Strategic Alignment (Approx. 400 words)
Explanation of how the project aligns with business goals and stakeholder needs.
Consideration of key project financial and non-financial selection criteria including:
feasibility, cost-benefit analysis, business strategic drivers, and/or SWOT analysis.
3. Project Scope and Planning (Approx. 300 words)
Clearly define project scope (In-Scope and Out-of-Scope elements).
Identify key project constraints (time, cost, resources, risk, quality) as per PMBOK's
Principles and Performance Domains.
Incorporate a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and milestone definition. Include
assumptions and dependencies.
4. Methodology and Delivery Approach (Approx. 400 words)
Comparison of Agile and Waterfall methodologies in relation to the project.
MGT201A_Assessment_2_Brief Page 3 of 6
Overview of key project phases and execution strategies, using PMBOK's development,
planning, work, delivery and measurement performance domains.
5. Stakeholder Engagement and Communication (Approx. 300 words)
Identification of key stakeholders and their roles, using PMBOK stakeholder engagement
techniques.
Development of a Stakeholder Communication Plan aligned with PMBOK
communication principles.
Strategies for managing stakeholder expectations and feedback loops.
6. Risk and Resource Management (Approx. 300 words)
Identification of potential project risks and mitigation strategies, applying PMBOK risk
management processes.
? Resource planning and allocation for people management
? Budget considerations and cost estimation techniques using PMBOK cost management
guidelines.
7. Conclusion and Recommendations (Approx. 150 words)
? Summary of key findings.
? Reflection on professional learnings from the assessment process.
Referencing
It is essential that you use current APA style for citing and referencing the sources that you use.
Please see more information on citing and referencing guidelines on the Academic Success webpage.
Assessment Support
For a range of additional resources and support to help you complete your assessment, please
consult the Study Support page on the Student Hub.
Academic Integrity
All students are responsible for ensuring that their submitted work is original, adheres to academic
writing standards outlined in the Torrens University Academic Writing Guide, and is appropriately
referenced according to the guidelines provided in the Torrens University APA Referencing Guide.
Students need to have read and be aware of the Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity
Policy, Academic Integrity Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. For more
information, please refer to the Academic Integrity guidelines and the Torrens University Library.
Students must also keep all required evidence in making an assessment; a copy of all submitted
material and any assessment drafts.
MGT201A_Assessment_2_Brief Page 4 of 6
Generative AI
Please refer to the Torrens University Library for guidance on the use of Generative AI. Please speak
to your learning facilitator regarding the use of GenAI tools in your assessments.
Submission Instructions
Submit this task via Assessments > Briefs & Submissions in the main navigation menu in MGT201A –
Project Management. Please name your file using the following format:
o SubjectCode_Surname_FirstNameInitial_AssessmentNumber
e.g. MGT201A _Jones_S_Assessment 2.docx
Your marked assessment can be viewed in MyLearn.
Assessment Due Dates and Late Penalties
Assessments may be submitted on or before the due date. Late penalties apply for assessments that
are submitted after the due date.
Refer to:
Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework (HE) and ELICOS
Torrens University | Think Education
Assessment Special Consideration Guidelines for Students (HE Coursework)
Torrens University | Think Education
Student Hub for Assessment Extension Information.
Special Consideration
To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment task or exam due to
unexpected or extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher
Education Coursework and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed
Application for Assessment Special Consideration Form to your learning facilitator.
MGT201A_Assessment_2_Brief