代做PROG2005、代写C/C++，Python程序
PROG2005 Assessment 2
PROG2005 PROGRAMMING MOBILE SYSTEMS
Summary
Title Assessment 2 – Programming project - TypeScript and Angular
Type Individual submission (NOT a group)
Due Date Week 4 Monday at 11:59 PM NSW time
Length Refer to the assessment details below
Weighting 40%
Academic Integrity Contract cheating and the use of GenAI, such as ChatGPT, in this
assignment are strictly prohibited. Any breach may have severe
consequences. Please read carefully the Academic Integrity section below.
Submission Via Blackboard. You will need to submit your code for tasks in Parts 1 and
2 of the assessment by writing your code in TypeScript and Angular. For
more details, please read the submission instructions below.
Unit Learning
Outcomes
This assessment task maps to the following ULOs:
• ULO1: contrast mobile device architectures, interfaces, operating
systems, and common middleware technology
• ULO2: apply user-centred techniques to create application
interfaces
• ULO4: analyse and explain privacy and security requirements
specific to mobile applications
Rationale
This assessment is crafted to deepen your understanding of TypeScript and Angular by engaging you
in the development of applications that are relevant to Web and mobile systems programming. It
serves as a practical opportunity to apply theoretical knowledge to real-world scenarios, enhancing
your skills in creating user-centred interfaces and addressing privacy and security considerations in
mobile and Web app development. Through this hands-on experience, you're expected to become
proficient in these modern programming frameworks, setting a solid foundation for more advanced
topics and projects in the field. The assessment will be further improved and extended in Assessment
3.
Task Description
Part 2 can be an expansion of Part 1. In this assessment, you are tasked with creating standalone
applications using TypeScript and Angular, showcasing your grasp of these technologies. Your
challenge is to develop a basic app for an art gallery in TypeScript (Part 1) and then extend or recreate
this app using Angular (Part 2). Your applications should function without server-side interaction and
maintain data structures for persistent user interactions within a session. This project not only tests
your technical skills but also your ability to apply user-centred design principles in creating intuitive
application interfaces. Though you can start again from scratch if you wish, it is recommended that
you save your Part 1 before you start modifying it for Part 2. For lesser marks, you can divide your
PROG2005 Assessment 2
assessment into several smaller HTML pages to demonstrate the different aspects without having
everything working together. This is not the preferred method.
Task Instructions
Part 1 – Basic TypeScript App
• Objective: Create a TypeScript-based inventory management system that helps manage a
simple database of items. The app should function while the browser is open, with no
requirement for data persistence after closing the browser.
• Initialisation: Start with either hardcoded data or an empty structure. Use TypeScript
effectively, ensuring appropriate type definitions for parameters and return values.
• Data Fields: The system should store: Item ID (Unique), Item Name, Category (Electronics,
Furniture, Clothing, Tools, Miscellaneous), Quantity, Price , Supplier Name, Stock Status (In
Stock, Low Stock, Out of Stock), Featured Item (Yes, No), Special Note. All fields, except 'Special
Note,' require values. An Item ID can only be entered and saved once (it must be unique for
each item).
• Features:
o Add, edit, and update item details. Update should be done using item name.
o Delete item with confirmation prompts using item name.
o Search functionality based on item name.
o Display all items in the database.
o Display all featured items in the database.
o Responsive design, ensuring usability on both narrow and wide mobile screens.
o Implement interactive elements (use innerHTML assignments instead of alert() calls).
o Use CSS styles for basic styling and improve the user experience.
• Requirements:
o Implement a structured data model (TypeScript array of objects/interfaces) that
maintains data integrity through type enforcement.
o Focus on TypeScript functionality, using minimal HTML form elements.
o TypeScript typing is necessary for parameters and return values, though function
types may be inferred.
o Ensure well-structured, clean, and commented code. Submit Part 1 in a separate
directory to avoid penalties.
o Use data validation while performing the operations on the recorded data.
Part 2 – Basic Angular App
• Objective: Extend or recreate the TypeScript app as a multi-page Angular application. The app
should incorporate features for managing books and authors efficiently.
• Pages: The Angular app should contain at least five pages, including:
o A homepage displaying the purpose of the app.
o A page for adding and editing books and authors.
o A book search page with filtering options.
o A privacy and security analysis page explaining key security considerations.
PROG2005 Assessment 2
o A help page with FAQs and troubleshooting guidance.
• Features:
o Add, edit, and update item details. Update should be done using item name.
o Delete item with confirmation prompts using item name.
o Search functionality based on item name.
o Display all items in the database.
o Display all featured items in the database.
o A dedicated page that presents text explaining these privacy and security
requirements.
• Code Structure:
o Maintain modular, commented, and well-organized code.
o Submit Part 2 separately to ensure clarity and organization.
• Requirement:
o Your Angular app must include at least one module and one component, but
additional components should be created to implement necessary functionalities.
o Ensure the app is user-friendly, responsive, functional, and validates all inputs (e.g.,
numeric fields should not accept letters).
If you are experiencing personal or/and difficult situations, you must apply for a Special Consideration
(see the link below) and inform your tutor before the due date to be considered. Unless an extension
is approved, there is a late submission penalty.
Resources
In this section, provide links to resources required to complete the assessment task.
Use the following resources to support you when working on this assessment.
• Unit Modules 2 - 4 on Blackboard.
• Angular documentation (https://angular.io/docs)
Referencing Style Resource
NA
Task Submission
You are required to submit your source code for both parts of the assessment as a single ZIP archive.
Please upload this ZIP file to the designated submission link on the unit site. For TypeScript, ensure
that you include TS files. If the file size exceeds the upload limit, please send the ZIP file via email or
through a method specified by your tutor.
Ensure that your source code is well-structured and adequately commented, as you will be penalized
for poorly structured or uncommented code. Each source code file submitted must include title
comments identifying the author and the assignment part. Additionally, please organize the separate
parts of the assignment into separate subdirectories (e.g., Part 1, Part 2, etc.). Failure to follow this
instruction may result in penalties.
PROG2005 Assessment 2
Please note that this assignment is due after the weekly modules have covered all required
materials. It is advisable not to leave this assignment until the last minute; you can begin working on
it while the concepts are fresh in your mind. You may start Part 1 before completing the study of all
required materials. If you need an extension, you must apply to your tutor before the due date. Late
submissions without an approved extension will incur penalties.
Academic Integrity
At Southern Cross University, academic integrity means behaving with the values of honesty, fairness,
trustworthiness, courage, responsibility and respect in relation to academic work.
The Southern Cross University Academic Integrity Framework aims to develop a holistic, systematic
and consistent approach to addressing academic integrity across the entire University. For more
information, see: SCU Academic Integrity Framework
NOTE: Academic Integrity breaches include unacceptable use of generative artificial intelligence
(GenAI) tools, the use of GenAI has not been appropriately acknowledged or is beyond the acceptable
limit as defined in the Assessment, poor referencing, not identifying direct quotations correctly, close
paraphrasing, plagiarism, recycling, misrepresentation, collusion, cheating, contract cheating,
fabricating information.
At SCU the use of GenAI tools is acceptable, unless it is beyond the acceptable limit as defined in the
Assessment Item by the Unit Assessor.
GenAI may not be used
Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools, such as ChatGPT, for completing the assessment
tasks is prohibited. You only can take guidance from GenAI tools, e.g., you can find relevant examples
or use for troubleshooting purpose only. You are required to demonstrate if you have developed the
unit’s skills and knowledge. If you use GenAI tools to generate the code and you fail to demonstrate
the required skills in your assessment task, it may result in an academic integrity breach against you
as described in the Student Academic and Non-Academic Misconduct Rules, Section 3.
This assessment, which is to be completed individually, is your chance to gain an understanding of the
fundamental concepts of TypeScript and Angular on which later learning will be based. It is important
that you master these concepts yourself.
Since you are mastering fundamental skills, you are permitted to work from the examples in the
MySCU site or study guide, but you must acknowledge assistance from other textbooks, classmates,
or online resources. In particular, you must not use online material or help from others, as this would
prevent you from mastering these concepts.
This diagram will help you understand where you can get help:
Lecturer
Tutors
GenAI e.g.,
ChatGPT
Online
Forums
Relatives Students
outside unit
Hired
coders
PROG2005 Assessment 2
Classmates Private
Tutors
Other
Encouraged
Attribution Required
Ask tutor
Not acceptable
Note: If your marker has any suspicion that you had help with your code or that your work is not
your own you will be asked to come to a meeting with your marker to explain your code. Any
student who is unable to explain their code will be submitted for academic misconduct.
Special Consideration
Please refer to the Special Consideration section of Policy.
https://policies.scu.edu.au/document/view-current.php?id=140
Late Submissions & Penalties
Please refer to the Late Submission & Penalties section of Policy.
https://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00255
Grades & Feedback
Assessments that have been submitted by the due date will receive an SCU grade. Grades and
feedback will be posted to the ‘Grades and Feedback’ section on the Blackboard unit site. Please allow
7 days for marks to be posted.
Assessment Rubric
Marking criteria for this assessment can be found on the Assessment page.
Description of SCU Grades
High Distinction:
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements,
demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and
concepts, and shows exceptional ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The
student’s performance could be described as outstanding in relation to the learning requirements
specified.
Distinction:
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements,
demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and
concepts, and shows a well-developed ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The
student’s performance could be described as distinguished in relation to the learning requirements
specified.
Credit:
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements specified,
demonstrates insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts.
The student’s performance could be described as competent in relation to the learning requirements
specified.
Pass:
The student’s performance satisfies all of the basic learning requirements specified and provides a
sound basis for proceeding to higher-level studies in the subject area. The student’s performance
could be described as satisfactory in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Fail:
The student’s performance fails to satisfy the learning requirements specified.
PROG2005 Assessment 2
PROG2005 Assessment 2
Marking Criteria
and %
allocation
High
Distinction
(85–100%)
Distinction
(75–84%)
Credit
(65–74%)
Pass
(50–64%)
Fail
0–49%
Understanding
of Mobile
Device
Architectures
(ULO1)
[Overall
functionality of
TypeScript and
Angular apps]
15%
Exhibits an
exceptional
understanding
of mobile
architectures,
demonstrating
how advanced
components
and their
integration
directly impact
application
performance
and user
experience.
[All
functionalities
are
demonstrated
extensively and
working
correctly.]
Shows a
distinguished
understanding
of mobile
architectures,
clearly linking
architectural
components
to the
efficiency and
responsivenes
s of the
applications
developed.
[All
functionalities
are working
correctly.]
Demonstrates
insightful
understanding
of mobile
architectures,
making
relevant
connections
between
architectural
choices and
the
functionality
of their
applications.
[Majority of
the
functionalities
are working
correctly.]
Shows a basic
understanding
of mobile
architectures,
with an
effective
connection
between
architectural
components
and
application
performance.
[Key
functionalities
are working
correctly, with
a few missing
functionalities.
]
Demonstrates
insufficient
understanding
of mobile
architectures,
with no clear
link to how it
affects
application
development.
[Majority
functionalities
are working
incorrectly or
missing.]
Proper Use of
Middleware
Technology
(ULO1)
[Implementatio
n of TypeScript
and Angular
apps]
40%
Demonstrates
innovative and
optimal use of
Angular and
TypeScript to
implement app
functionality
and enhanced
performance,
showcasing
advanced
problem solving and
integration
skills. All
features and
requirements
of the
applications
have been
implemented
flawlessly.
[All features
are
implemented
correctly with
Applies
Angular and
TypeScript
features
effectively,
significantly
improving app
functionality
and user
experience
with clear
evidence of
strategic
integration. All
critical
features and
requirements
of the
applications
are
implemented
with minor
errors or
omissions that
do not
significantly
Implements
The
application
features
correctly,
enhancing app
functionality
with a focus
on improving
performance
and user
experience.
Most of the
essential
features and
requirements
of the
applications
are
implemented
correctly, with
some errors or
omissions that
affect
functionality
or
Utilises
Angular and
TypeScript
with
competency,
showing
understanding
but limited
optimisation.
The basic
features and
requirements
of the
applications
are
implemented
to a
satisfactory
standard,
though several
errors or
omissions may
be present,
affecting
functionality
and
Fails to apply
Angular and
TypeScript
effectively,
resulting in poor
app
performance
and limited
functionality.
Many features
and
requirements of
the applications
are either not
implemented or
are
implemented
incorrectly,
resulting in
significant issues
with
functionality
and
performance.
The application
does not meet
PROG2005 Assessment 2
advanced skills
and proper
commenting.]
impact the
overall
functionality
or
performance.
[All key
features are
implemented
correctly with
ignorable
errors and
proper
commenting.]
performance
but are not
critical to the
overall
operation.
[Majority of
the key
features are
implemented
correctly with
minor errors
and some
commenting.]
performance.
The
application
meets the
minimum
criteria for
acceptance.
[Only basic
features are
implemented
correctly
implemented
with some
errors and
fewer
comments.]
the minimum
criteria for
acceptance.
[Poor
implementation
with several
critical errors.]
Effectiveness of
User Interface
Design (ULO2)
[UI and UX of
TypeScript and
Angular apps]
20%
Designs an
interface with
innovative
Angular and
TypeScript UI
elements that
significantly
enhance user
experience,
demonstrating
creativity and
foresight.
[Excellent
choice of UI
elements and
enhanced UX.]
Utilises
Angular and
TypeScript UI
elements
effectively,
facilitating
clear and
intuitive
navigation and
interaction.
[Effective
choice of UI
elements and
clear/intuitive
UX.]
Employs
Angular and
TypeScript UI
elements
competently,
with
considerations
for innovation
and user
experience.
[Good choice
of UI elements
and basic UX.]
Implements
Angular and
TypeScript UI
elements in a
basic manner,
achieving
functional but
unsophisticate
d navigation
and
interaction.
[Basic UI
elements are
used and UX
functional but
limited.]
Fails to
effectively use
Angular and
TypeScript UI
elements,
leading to poor
user navigation
and overall
experience.
[Poor choice of
UI elements
causing bad
navigation and
UX.]
Integration of
Feedback
Mechanisms
and Responsive
Design (ULO2)
[User feedback
in TypeScript
and Angular
apps]
20%
Seamlessly
integrates
responsive
design with
feedback
mechanisms,
enabling
flawless user
experience
while actively
incorporating
user feedback
to enhance
interface
intuitiveness
and
functionality.
[Excellent user
feedback
Effectively
combines
responsive
design with
user feedback
integration,
ensuring a
positive user
experience
and making
noticeable
improvements
based on user
interactions.
[Effective user
feedback
mechanism is
demonstrated.
]
Demonstrates
good
integration of
responsive
design and
feedback
mechanisms,
resulting in a
responsive
application
that adapts to
user
suggestions
for improved
usability.
[Good user
feedback
mechanism is
Achieves basic
responsiveness
and
incorporates
some user
feedback,
meeting
minimum
standards for
adaptability
and user
engagement in
the app.
[Basic user
feedback
mechanism is
demonstrated.
]
Fails to integrate
responsive
design or
feedback
mechanisms
effectively,
leading to poor
usability and
limited
responsiveness
of the app.
[Poor user
feedback
mechanism is
demonstrated.]
PROG2005 Assessment 2
mechanism is
demonstrated.]
demonstrated.
]
Privacy and
Security
Requirement
Analysis (ULO4)
[Privacy
analysis in
Angular app]
5%
Conducts a
comprehensive
analysis of
privacy and
security
requirements,
integrates
findings into
the application
with an
informative
page in the app
that clearly and
effectively
communicates
these aspects
to users.
[Comprehensiv
e analysis and
discussion.]
Provides a
detailed and
comprehensiv
e analysis of
privacy and
security
requirements,
effectively
communicatin
g them
through a
dedicated
page in the
application.
[Detailed
analysis and
discussion.]
Conducts an
accurate
analysis of
privacy and
security
requirements,
with a clear
presentation
of these
requirements
on a dedicated
page within
the
application.
[Accurate
analysis and
discussion.]
Provides a
basic analysis
of privacy and
security
requirements,
with an
attempt to
communicate
these
effectively in
the
application.
[Basic analysis
and
discussion.]
Inadequate
analysis of
privacy and
security
requirements;
fails to
effectively
communicate
these through a
page in the
application.
[Poor/insufficien
t analysis and
discussion.]